WVU Cyber-Resilience Resource Center: Inside the AI-Driven Cybersecurity Training Range Powering West Virginia’s Defenses
What if the same AI that helps your team write code, summarize reports, and triage alerts also gave attackers a faster, cheaper, and more convincing way to break in? That’s the uneasy paradox of cybersecurity in 2026—and exactly why West Virginia University’s new Cyber-Resilience Resource Center (CRRC) has become a timely anchor for businesses and critical infrastructure operators navigating AI’s double edge.
On February 8, 2026, coverage from WV Metro News spotlighted the CRRC as a first-of-its-kind training range tailored to real-world defenses for companies and critical infrastructure across the region. The center’s director, Dr. Giti Ramezan, underscored a crucial point: AI can supercharge productivity, but it also expands the attack surface—and sharing personally identifiable information (PII) with generative AI tools could inadvertently expose sensitive data through cloud transmission. It’s the kind of nuance that makes practical, hands-on training not just helpful, but essential.
If you’re a WV manufacturer, a hospital with a growing IoT footprint, a county utility, or a small business that’s suddenly “doing AI,” this is your moment. Let’s unpack what WVU’s CRRC brings to the table, why hands-on cyber ranges are becoming the gold standard for readiness, and how to build a playbook that turns AI from a risk into a resilient advantage.
Source: WV Metro News
The AI–Cybersecurity Crossroads: Why 2026 Is Different
AI is no longer a side project—it’s in the core workflow. That’s good news for productivity, but it also levels the playing field for adversaries:
- AI-powered reconnaissance tools can quickly map your exposed services and known vulnerabilities.
- Deepfake audio and video make social engineering more convincing than ever.
- Automated phishing kits craft custom lures using your public digital footprint.
- Low-cost LLMs help inexperienced attackers refine scripts, obfuscate malware, and iterate faster.
- IoT and “smart” devices multiply blind spots, especially in hospitals, utilities, and manufacturing floors.
In short, AI changes the tempo of attacks. Defenders need to move from “detect and respond” to “anticipate and rehearse.” That’s where a cyber range—especially one designed with AI-augmented threats in mind—makes a measurable difference.
What WVU’s Cyber-Resilience Resource Center Brings to the Fight
According to WV Metro News reporting, the CRRC is designed to meet organizations where they are—offering practical, scenario-based training that mirrors the way attacks unfold in the real world. Highlights from the coverage include:
- A first-of-its-kind training range aimed at businesses and critical infrastructure.
- Partnerships that extend the center’s capacity to address national-level threats.
- A focus on accessibility for West Virginia organizations seeking to test and strengthen defenses.
- Simulations that help teams confront AI-enhanced attacks, particularly those preying on IoT and pervasive connectivity.
- Emphasis on incident response, threat detection, and secure AI usage across day-to-day operations.
- A firm reminder to avoid putting PII into AI platforms that transmit data to the cloud, due to leakage and retention risks.
When a regional hub can translate complex AI-era risks into hands-on exercises, smaller organizations—often targets because of limited resources—get a fighting chance to build muscle memory before an incident hits.
What Makes a Training Range so Valuable?
- It lets you break things safely. You can simulate ransomware, supply chain compromises, and AI-driven phishing without risking production environments.
- It accelerates learning across roles. Executives, IT admins, SOC analysts, legal, and PR can rehearse together.
- It turns guidance into action. Frameworks like NIST CSF 2.0 and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework become playbooks, not PDFs.
- It strengthens the third-party fabric. Many attacks propagate via vendors; a range helps you test assumptions and contracts with evidence.
- It reveals friction points. Permissions, logging gaps, escalation paths—weaknesses surface faster in realistic drills than in slide decks.
Why Hands-On Beats Slide Decks in the AI Era
Traditional training leans on awareness sessions and written procedures. Useful, yes—but insufficient when attacks arrive as polymorphic malware, voice-cloned executives, or supply chain LLM misconfigurations. Ranges deliver:
- Muscle memory: Rapid containment and recovery depend on practiced steps, not theory.
- Speed: Lower mean time to detect (MTTD) and mean time to respond (MTTR) often hinge on rehearsed coordination.
- Confidence: Leaders are more likely to fund gaps they’ve witnessed in simulations.
- Measurability: You can track improvement across drills—patch latency, EDR coverage, phishing resilience, backup integrity.
A Practical Playbook: 12 Moves to Boost Cyber-Resilience in an AI-Driven World
Whether you engage the CRRC or start internally, these steps create a durable foundation:
- Map your critical assets and data flows – Prioritize crown jewels (e.g., EMR systems, industrial control networks, ERP, payment platforms). – Diagram dependencies: identity, DNS, email security, cloud providers, IoT gateways.
- Classify and protect sensitive data (especially PII) – Implement data classification and tagging. – Use DLP and CASB tools to govern data across SaaS and generative AI integrations.
- Shore up identity and access – Enforce phishing-resistant MFA (e.g., FIDO2/passkeys) for admins and remote access. – Adopt least privilege and regular access reviews, especially for service accounts.
- Harden endpoints and workloads – Deploy EDR/XDR with behavioral analytics and curated detections (e.g., MITRE ATT&CK mapping). – Patch within risk-based SLAs; prioritize internet-facing and high-CVSS vulnerabilities.
- Segment networks—especially IoT and OT – Put medical devices, cameras, and industrial controllers on isolated VLANs or SDN microsegments. – Block east–west traffic by default; monitor for anomalous device behavior.
- Build resilient backups and recovery – Follow 3-2-1-1-0: three copies, two media, one offsite, one immutable, zero restore errors (test it). – Define RTO/RPO aligned to business impact.
- Strengthen email and collaboration security – Layer DMARC/DKIM/SPF, advanced phishing detection, and sandboxing. – Train continuously with realistic, AI-shaped phishing simulations.
- Govern AI usage – Create clear AI acceptable-use policies: no PII, secrets, or regulated data in public AI tools. – Prefer enterprise AI instances with retention controls and tenant-isolation.
- Monitor cloud posture – Use CSPM/CWPP/CIEM to uncover misconfigurations and overprivileged identities. – Automate guardrails in pipelines (IaC scanning, secret scanning, SAST/DAST).
Prepare for ransomware and extortion
- Pre-stage playbooks: isolation, legal/regulatory steps, crisis comms.
- Use CISA’s Ransomware Guidance to validate controls.
Test, test, test
- Run tabletop exercises across ransomware, BEC/deepfake, OT disruption, and SaaS data leakage.
- Leverage a range to validate assumptions and measure improvement.
Close supply chain gaps
- Request SBOMs from vendors and assess update cadences.
- Monitor third-party risk continuously, not just at onboarding.
Secure AI Usage 101: The PII Problem and How to Avoid It
Dr. Ramezan’s caution about PII and AI isn’t abstract—it’s operationally vital. Here’s a straightforward, defensible approach:
- Don’t paste secrets into public AI tools
- Treat prompts like emails: if you wouldn’t email it externally, don’t share it with a public LLM.
- Prefer enterprise-grade AI controls
- Use organization-managed platforms with data retention disabled, audit logging, and tenant isolation.
- Enforce DLP at the edge
- Apply DLP policies in endpoints and SaaS tools to block outbound PII and regulated content to AI services.
- Add guardrails to AI apps
- Implement content filters, prompt injection defenses, input validation, and output moderation.
- Reference: OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications.
- Adopt a model risk framework
- Use the NIST AI RMF to catalogue AI systems, risks, and controls.
- Train your people
- Nontechnical users need clear do/don’t examples; update training quarterly as tools evolve.
- Log everything
- Centralize AI usage logs in your SIEM for anomaly detection and investigations.
Scenarios a Cyber Range Can Help You Rehearse
While specifics will vary by organization, these example scenarios reflect common AI-era threats you’ll want to practice:
- Ransomware in a hybrid cloud – Attackers phish a user with an AI-personalized message, pivot via OAuth consent abuse, and deploy ransomware across file shares and cloud storage. Your team must isolate, revoke tokens, rotate creds, and recover from immutable backups.
- IoT-driven disruption in critical infrastructure – A water utility’s smart sensors and cameras are co-opted into a botnet. Your team uses network segmentation, anomaly detection, and incident response workflows to restore stability without halting essential services.
- Executive deepfake and business email compromise – Attackers deploy voice cloning in a “CEO urgency” call while using an inbox rule to hide replies. The finance team must validate out-of-band, security responds with mailbox forensics, and legal coordinates disclosures.
- AI supply chain data leakage – A third-party plugin in a productivity suite routes internal prompts to an external LLM with weak controls. Your team must identify the flow, block exfiltration, notify stakeholders, and implement vendor guardrails.
Practicing these end-to-end—with IT, security, legal, HR, and leadership—turns policy into performance.
Measuring Cyber-Resilience: Metrics That Actually Matter
- MTTD and MTTR: Time to detect and contain across a range of incident types.
- Backup reliability: % of successful restore tests; RTO/RPO adherence.
- Patch velocity: Median time to remediate high-risk vulnerabilities on internet-facing assets.
- Phishing resilience: Click and report rates; time to takedown spoofed domains.
- Identity hygiene: Admin accounts with phishing-resistant MFA; age of service account secrets.
- Coverage: EDR/XDR deployment and SIEM logging completeness for critical systems.
- Tabletop cadence: Number and breadth of cross-functional exercises per quarter.
- Third-party risk: % of critical vendors with SBOMs, security attestations, and monitoring in place.
How West Virginia Organizations Can Engage
- Start with a risk snapshot
- Inventory critical assets, crown jewels, and key business processes to focus training scenarios.
- Consider a pilot range exercise
- Choose one scenario—like ransomware or deepfake-enabled fraud—and rehearse it with a small, cross-functional team.
- Align with national guidance
- Map your program to NIST CSF 2.0 and the CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals.
- Build momentum
- Use findings to secure budget for the next three improvements with the biggest risk reduction.
To learn more about the reported capabilities and mission of the CRRC, see the WV Metro News coverage: WVU Cyber-Resilience Resource Center finds niche in AI world. You can also explore WVU’s broader programs via West Virginia University.
For national program context, see the NSA’s National Centers of Academic Excellence in Cybersecurity (NCAE-C), which recognizes institutions advancing cyber education and resilience.
Where This Fits in the National Picture
WVU’s CRRC complements a broader national push to strengthen resilience against AI-accelerated threats:
- Frameworks and guidance
- NIST CSF 2.0: Updated cybersecurity framework for governance-to-recovery coverage.
- NIST AI RMF: Risk-first approach to AI safety and security.
- CISA CPGs: Minimum practices to reduce the most common cyber risks.
- Threat-informed defense
- MITRE ATT&CK: Shared taxonomy of adversary tactics and techniques.
- MITRE D3FEND: Defensive countermeasures mapped to ATT&CK.
- Sector-specific resilience
- CISA Shields Up: Alerts, advisories, and best practices against nation-state and criminal threats.
- CISA IoT Security Guidance: Resources to secure connected devices at scale.
These resources, paired with a regional training range, accelerate the shift from reactive security to operational resilience.
Common Mistakes to Avoid as You Adopt AI
- Pasting PII, secrets, or regulated data into public AI tools.
- Assuming MFA alone stops identity attacks; session hijacking and token theft are real.
- Treating IoT like “just cameras”—they’re computers with network access.
- Skipping rigorous restore tests; backups that don’t restore aren’t backups.
- Letting service accounts age unreviewed with broad, static permissions.
- Not instrumenting AI use; you can’t secure what you can’t see.
- Failing to segment OT/IoT networks from IT environments.
- Relying on annual training; AI-era threats evolve monthly.
- Overlooking vendor and plugin ecosystems in SaaS and AI tools.
- Postponing tabletop exercises until “we have time.” Incidents don’t wait.
Quick-Start Resources
- WVU coverage: WV Metro News on the CRRC
- Frameworks and guidance:
- NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
- NIST AI Risk Management Framework
- CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals
- Threat and defense knowledge:
- MITRE ATT&CK
- MITRE D3FEND
- OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications
- Incident preparedness:
- CISA Ransomware Guidance
- FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3)
FAQ
Q: What is WVU’s Cyber-Resilience Resource Center (CRRC)? A: As reported by WV Metro News, the CRRC is a hands-on training range at West Virginia University designed to help businesses and critical infrastructure prepare for, detect, and respond to modern cyber threats—including AI-augmented attacks—through practical simulations and exercises.
Q: Is the CRRC only for large organizations? A: No. The coverage emphasizes accessibility for West Virginia organizations, including small businesses and infrastructure operators. Smaller teams often benefit most from structured, hands-on training because they can immediately translate lessons into policy and tooling.
Q: What does “training range” mean in practice? A: A cyber range is a safe, controlled environment where teams can simulate real attacks, rehearse incident response, test tools and configurations, and measure performance without risking production systems.
Q: How does AI change cybersecurity risk? A: AI speeds up reconnaissance, personalizes phishing, aids malware obfuscation, and makes social engineering more convincing (e.g., voice deepfakes). Defenders must adapt with better identity controls, segmentation, resilient backups, and continuous rehearsals of response playbooks.
Q: Should we ever put PII into AI tools? A: As Dr. Ramezan cautions, avoid entering PII into AI platforms that transmit data to the cloud unless you’re using an enterprise-controlled instance with strict retention, isolation, and audit guarantees. When in doubt, don’t share sensitive data.
Q: Which standards should we align to? A: Start with NIST CSF 2.0 for cybersecurity program structure, the NIST AI RMF for AI-specific risks, and CISA’s CPGs for baseline controls. Use MITRE ATT&CK to inform detection engineering.
Q: How often should we run exercises? A: Quarterly at minimum for tabletops, with annual or semiannual live range exercises that include executives, legal, comms, and operations. After major changes (e.g., new SaaS, M&A, AI tool rollouts), run targeted drills.
Q: Can AI replace SOC analysts? A: No. AI can augment triage, enrichment, and automation, but human judgment is essential—especially for legal, ethical, and business-context decisions. The best results come from human-in-the-loop workflows.
Q: What if we don’t have a big security budget? A: Focus on high-impact moves: phishing-resistant MFA for admins, EDR on endpoints, robust and tested backups, network segmentation for IoT, and continuous phishing training. Then use range findings to justify targeted investments.
Q: How do we get executive buy-in? A: Show—not tell. Run a concise tabletop that surfaces real gaps and likely business impact, then present a 90-day plan with 3–5 prioritized fixes, costs, and risk reduction. Leaders respond to clarity and evidence.
The Bottom Line
AI is rewriting the rules of both productivity and cyber risk. West Virginia University’s Cyber-Resilience Resource Center arrives at a pivotal moment, offering a practical, hands-on training ground to help organizations turn uncertainty into readiness. If you operate in West Virginia—or anywhere facing AI-accelerated threats—the path forward is clear: rehearse realistic scenarios, harden identity and data, govern AI use, and measure what matters.
Resilience isn’t a document. It’s a skill you build. The sooner you start, the stronger you get.
Discover more at InnoVirtuoso.com
I would love some feedback on my writing so if you have any, please don’t hesitate to leave a comment around here or in any platforms that is convenient for you.
For more on tech and other topics, explore InnoVirtuoso.com anytime. Subscribe to my newsletter and join our growing community—we’ll create something magical together. I promise, it’ll never be boring!
Stay updated with the latest news—subscribe to our newsletter today!
Thank you all—wishing you an amazing day ahead!
Read more related Articles at InnoVirtuoso
- How to Completely Turn Off Google AI on Your Android Phone
- The Best AI Jokes of the Month: February Edition
- Introducing SpoofDPI: Bypassing Deep Packet Inspection
- Getting Started with shadps4: Your Guide to the PlayStation 4 Emulator
- Sophos Pricing in 2025: A Guide to Intercept X Endpoint Protection
- The Essential Requirements for Augmented Reality: A Comprehensive Guide
- Harvard: A Legacy of Achievements and a Path Towards the Future
- Unlocking the Secrets of Prompt Engineering: 5 Must-Read Books That Will Revolutionize You
