|

Quantum Computing vs. Encryption: Will Hackers Break Today’s Security? What You Need to Know Now

ByInnoVirtuoso

If a hacker stole your encrypted data today, could a future quantum computer unlock it tomorrow? That’s the unsettling question driving a global race to rebuild the cryptography that protects everything from your bank account to national secrets.

Here’s the short version: Quantum computers exploit physics to solve certain math problems dramatically faster than classical machines. That speed threatens today’s most widely used public-key encryption. Governments are moving fast. Big tech is already testing new defenses. And yes—your organization should be planning the migration now.

In this guide, I’ll break it down in plain English: how quantum works, why it breaks some crypto, what “post-quantum” security looks like, how far the research has come, and the concrete steps to take today. No hype. No hand-waving. Just the facts—and what they mean for you.

Let’s start with the basics.

How Quantum Computing Works (Without the Jargon)

Classical computers use bits—0s and 1s. Every operation flips those bits in predictable ways.

Quantum computers use qubits. A qubit can be 0 and 1 at the same time (superposition). Multiple qubits can be linked (entanglement) so that measuring one affects the others. And clever algorithms use interference to amplify right answers and cancel wrong ones.

A quick analogy: Imagine trying to find the one exit in a maze. A classical computer tries paths one by one. A quantum computer can explore many paths at once, then steer toward the exit by reinforcing paths that look promising.

A few things matter here:

  • Quantum advantage is algorithm-specific. Quantum doesn’t speed up everything. It crushes some math, leaves other math mostly unaffected.
  • Today’s machines are noisy. They make errors. Researchers are improving them, but we’re not at the “break-everything” stage.
  • The scary part is timing. Your sensitive data may need to stay secret for 10, 20, even 50 years. Attackers can “harvest now, decrypt later.”

Here’s why that last point matters…

Why Today’s Encryption Is at Risk

Most of the internet’s security rests on two pillars:

1) Symmetric cryptography (like AES): One secret key encrypts and decrypts data. It’s fast. It protects data “at rest” and in transit inside secure channels.

2) Public-key cryptography (like RSA and elliptic curve cryptography, or ECC): One public key to encrypt or verify. One private key to decrypt or sign. This is how you do key exchange in TLS, verify software updates, and establish trust.

Quantum computers attack these pillars differently.

  • Shor’s algorithm breaks RSA and ECC. It solves integer factorization and discrete logarithms in polynomial time, which collapses the security assumptions behind RSA and most elliptic curves. In practice, a large enough quantum computer could recover private keys. That would let attackers impersonate websites, forge code signatures, and decrypt many captured communications. For an accessible explainer, see IBM’s overview of Shor’s algorithm.
  • Grover’s algorithm speeds up brute-force search. It gives a quadratic (not exponential) speedup against symmetric keys and hashes. Translation: If you use AES-128, Grover makes it feel like AES-64. The fix is simple—use longer keys, like AES-256. NIST guidance here is clear: doubling key sizes counters Grover. See NISTIR 8105 for background.

The big takeaway: Quantum is an extinction-level event for RSA and for most ECC used today. It’s a manageable headwind for AES and modern hash functions.

Shor’s Algorithm in Plain English

Shor’s algorithm is a clever way to find the “period” of certain mathematical functions. That period reveals the prime factors of large numbers (RSA) or solves discrete logs (ECC). Classical computers need astronomical time to do this for large keys. A sufficiently powerful quantum computer would do it in hours or days.

You don’t need to master the math. What matters is the impact: If an attacker learns your private key, they can read past encrypted traffic (if recorded), impersonate you in the future, and break code-signing trust chains.

Grover’s Algorithm and Symmetric Safety

Grover’s algorithm helps search an unsorted space faster. Against symmetric crypto, that means:

  • Use AES-256 instead of AES-128 for long-term confidentiality.
  • Use SHA-256 or stronger for hashing. Quantum lowers the collision resistance of hash functions, but modern choices remain robust with appropriate parameters.

In short, symmetric crypto survives with prudent key sizes. Public-key crypto needs a replacement.

Enter Post‑Quantum Cryptography (PQC)

Post-quantum cryptography is classical cryptography designed to resist quantum attacks. It runs on ordinary computers and networks. No quantum hardware is required.

The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has led a multi-year, open competition to standardize PQC. After reviewing dozens of candidates, NIST selected primary algorithms in 2022 and began publishing draft standards in 2024. Track progress at NIST’s PQC project page.

The main families include:

  • Lattice-based: Fast and efficient; leading candidates for key exchange and signatures. Examples include Kyber (key encapsulation) and Dilithium (signatures).
  • Hash-based: Very conservative security; larger signatures. Example: SPHINCS+.
  • Code-based: Mature theory; large public keys. Example: Classic McEliece.
  • Multivariate and isogeny-based: Niche or still maturing after some breaks.

The Front-Runners You’ll Hear About

  • ML-KEM (Kyber): Chosen by NIST for key establishment. Draft FIPS published in 2024. It’s efficient and well-studied.
  • ML-DSA (Dilithium): Chosen for digital signatures. Also in draft FIPS status in 2024.
  • SPHINCS+: A stateless hash-based signature. Slower and larger, but trusted for its conservative design.

You can explore the NIST drafts here: – NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Selections and Draft Standards

Why these matter: They will underpin TLS, VPNs, software signing, code integrity, and more for decades.

Performance and Size Trade-Offs

PQC is not “drop-in” with identical properties:

  • Keys and signatures are larger. Plan for bigger certificates and handshake messages.
  • Sign/verify speeds vary. Lattices are fast; hash-based schemes are slower to sign.
  • Implementations must be hardened against side-channel attacks.

The good news: For most web and app use cases, the overhead is manageable. CDNs and browsers have already tested hybrids in production.

Real-World Progress in Quantum Computing

So, when do we worry about a quantum machine that can actually break RSA-2048 or P-256 ECC?

  • Hardware is advancing. Researchers have built devices with hundreds to thousands of physical qubits. IBM publishes a public roadmap for scaling and error correction work; see IBM’s quantum roadmap.
  • Quality matters more than raw qubit count. Breaking RSA requires logical (error-corrected) qubits with very low error rates. Converting physical qubits into logical ones demands huge overhead.
  • Estimates vary. Many experts believe breaking RSA-2048 would require millions of high-quality physical qubits and sustained error-corrected operation. That is not imminent—but it’s also not science fiction.

The honest answer: We don’t know the exact date. It could be a decade or more. But your adversaries can record traffic now and decrypt it later. That’s why agencies urge action today. See CISA’s guidance on PQC readiness: CISA Post-Quantum Cryptography Factsheet.

Why “Harvest Now, Decrypt Later” Changes the Risk

Attackers can and do capture encrypted data now, storing it in the hope that future quantum machines will crack it. If your data must remain confidential beyond the likely arrival of a cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC), you have a problem.

A simple formula to think about:

Confidentiality lifetime of the data + Time to inventory and migrate your crypto + Safety buffer

Time until a CRQC exists

If the left side looks longer, start migrating.

This is urgent for:

  • Government data with long classification lifetimes
  • Health records and genomic data
  • Financial histories and high-value transactions
  • Intellectual property and trade secrets
  • Critical infrastructure systems and logs

What Governments and Big Tech Are Doing

You’re not alone. The ecosystem is moving.

  • NIST standardization: NIST selected algorithms in 2022 and has released draft FIPS for key exchange and signatures in 2024. See NIST PQC.
  • U.S. policy: The White House issued NSM-10 directing agencies to inventory cryptographic systems and plan migrations. NSA published CNSA 2.0 with timelines for national security systems.
  • Industry deployments:
  • Cloudflare and Google tested hybrid TLS handshakes using Kyber alongside classical algorithms to protect web traffic. See Cloudflare on post-quantum TLS.
  • Google has enabled post-quantum protections in Chrome’s TLS to test performance and compatibility. See Google Security Blog.
  • Signal deployed a post-quantum key agreement (PQXDH) to protect end-to-end messaging. See Signal’s PQXDH announcement.
  • Standards work: ETSI maintains quantum-safe cryptography specifications and profiles; see ETSI Quantum-Safe Cryptography. The IETF is integrating PQC into TLS, certificates, and protocols; check the PQUIP working group.

This is all good news. The path is clear. Now it’s about execution.

What Your Organization Should Do Now

If you lead security, architecture, or compliance, here’s your action plan. You don’t need a quantum lab. You need focus, inventory, and crypto agility.

1) Build a cryptographic inventory – Identify where and how you use crypto: TLS, VPNs, SSH, S/MIME, code signing, PKI, HSMs, databases, backups, mobile apps, IoT firmware, embedded systems. – Include libraries and parameters: OpenSSL/BoringSSL/WolfSSL, Java providers, curve choices, key sizes, certificate chains, and hard-coded keys.

2) Classify data by confidentiality lifetime – How long must this data stay secret? Months, years, decades? – Map long-lived data and sessions (e.g., archival backups, medical records, industrial telemetry, control systems).

3) Prioritize by risk and exposure – Public endpoints and internet-facing services first. – High-value data and long retention next. – Supply chain hotspots: third-party software updates, code signing, device provisioning.

4) Demand crypto agility from vendors – Require support for PQC-ready libraries, hybrid key exchange, and larger certificate sizes. – Ask for a PQC migration roadmap and timelines. – Verify performance and side-channel protections.

5) Test hybrid deployments – Use hybrid key exchange in TLS/VPNs (e.g., X25519 + Kyber). This gives quantum resistance now, without dropping classical assurances. – Monitor handshake size, CPU impact, middlebox behavior, and failure modes.

6) Update policies, PKI, and key management – Prepare your CA and PKI to issue PQC or hybrid certificates when standards finalize. – Revisit key lifetimes and rotation policies. – Plan for larger certs and new object identifiers.

7) Pilot, then scale – Start with a limited scope (an internal service, a dev environment, or a partner link). – Measure compatibility and user impact. – Document lessons learned and expand.

8) Train your teams – Educate devs and SREs on PQC, hybrid handshakes, and certificate changes. – Update secure coding guidelines and crypto libraries.

9) Keep one eye on guidance – Follow NIST and CISA updates. See NIST PQC and CISA’s PQC page. – Track IETF drafts, browser changes, and CA/Browser Forum policies.

Here’s why this matters: The organizations that start now will avoid a messy, last-minute scramble when standards lock and mandates arrive. You’ll also reduce the risk of long-lived data being exposed later.

Don’t Forget the Long Tail: IoT, OT, and Embedded

Servers and browsers are only part of the story. Devices can be harder:

  • Firmware often hard-codes crypto. Updating it is costly and sometimes impossible.
  • Resource constraints make larger keys painful. Choose schemes that fit your footprint.
  • Long life cycles mean bigger “harvest now, decrypt later” risk. Think medical devices, smart meters, industrial controllers.

Plan separate workstreams for embedded and operational technology. Budget for testing. Validate bootloaders, secure updates, and code signing with PQC-friendly algorithms.

Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) vs. PQC: What’s the Difference?

QKD uses quantum physics to share keys between two endpoints. It’s interesting, but it’s not a drop-in replacement for the internet’s crypto stack. It requires special hardware, dedicated links, and careful trust models. Most national guidance prioritizes software-based PQC because it scales across today’s networks and use cases.

If you’re considering QKD, do it for very specific, high-assurance links—and still deploy PQC elsewhere. For broad adoption, PQC is the path.

Myths vs. Facts

  • “Quantum will break everything overnight.”
    False. Symmetric crypto like AES remains strong with larger keys. The real risk is to RSA and ECC.
  • “We can wait until a big breakthrough.”
    Risky. Migration is multi-year. Attackers can capture traffic today and decrypt it later.
  • “PQC will slow everything down.”
    Not in a show-stopping way. Many PQC schemes are fast. The main cost is larger keys and signatures, which networks can handle.
  • “We need quantum computers to use post-quantum crypto.”
    Nope. PQC runs on classical hardware. You can deploy it now.
  • “QKD makes PQC unnecessary.”
    No. QKD solves a different problem for limited scenarios. PQC is the practical, scalable defense for most systems.

What About Timelines?

It’s wise to plan on a phased migration:

  • Now: Inventory, vendor engagement, internal pilots, hybrid testing.
  • 12–24 months: Adopt NIST-approved algorithms as they finalize; update PKI and protocols; expand deployment.
  • Ongoing: Rotate keys, re-issue certs, and phase out vulnerable algorithms as standards and regulations evolve.

Policy momentum is strong. The U.S. government is already directing agencies to move. See NSM-10 and NSA CNSA 2.0.

Practical Tips to Avoid Common Pitfalls

  • Avoid homegrown crypto. Use vetted libraries that implement standardized PQC.
  • Keep hybrid for a while. Pair PQC with classical algorithms during the transition.
  • Watch certificate sizes. Larger certs may stress legacy systems and MTUs.
  • Harden implementations. PQC can be vulnerable to timing and cache attacks if not implemented carefully.
  • Document everything. You’ll need evidence of your migration for audits and partners.

The Bottom Line

Quantum computing will eventually break the public-key algorithms that secure today’s internet. We don’t need panic. We need a plan.

Start with an inventory. Prioritize long-lived data. Test hybrids. Push vendors. Track NIST and CISA. When the standards finalize, adopt them with confidence.

Do that, and you’ll be on the right side of the quantum curve.

FAQ: Quantum Computing and Encryption

Q: Can quantum computers break AES?
A: Not in the same way they break RSA/ECC. Grover’s algorithm gives a quadratic speedup, which is countered by using larger keys. AES-256 is recommended for long-term confidentiality. See NISTIR 8105.

Q: Is RSA “dead” today?
A: Not yet. But it’s on borrowed time for data that must stay secret for many years. Plan your migration now. Use hybrid approaches in the interim.

Q: When will NIST’s post-quantum standards be final?
A: NIST selected primary algorithms in 2022 and released draft FIPS documents in 2024. Final standards are expected to roll out in stages. Follow updates at NIST PQC.

Q: What is “harvest now, decrypt later”?
A: Adversaries capture encrypted data today, store it, and decrypt it in the future when they have quantum capabilities. If your data has a long confidentiality lifetime, this is a real risk. See CISA’s factsheet.

Q: Are VPNs, TLS, and SSH at risk?
A: Yes, if they rely on RSA or ECC for key exchange and authentication. The fix is to use PQC for key establishment and signatures—or hybrid handshakes that mix PQC with classical algorithms. Cloud providers and browsers are already testing this in production. See Cloudflare’s PQC TLS work and Google’s Chrome update.

Q: Should we use quantum key distribution (QKD) instead of PQC?
A: QKD is specialized and infrastructure-heavy. PQC is software-based and scales to the internet. Most organizations should prioritize PQC and consider QKD only for niche, high-assurance links. See ETSI Quantum-Safe Cryptography.

Q: Which post-quantum algorithms should we expect to use?
A: For most cases, a lattice-based KEM (Kyber/ML-KEM) for key exchange and a lattice-based signature (Dilithium/ML-DSA) for authentication. Hash-based signatures like SPHINCS+ may be used where extra conservatism is needed. See NIST PQC.

Q: Will post-quantum crypto slow down my applications?
A: There’s some overhead from larger keys and signatures, but many deployments show acceptable performance. Testing is key. Hybrid handshakes help you measure impact.

Q: What about code signing and software supply chain security?
A: This is critical. Plan for PQC-capable signing and verification, toolchain updates, and larger signatures. Coordinate with your vendors and registries well before deprecation deadlines.

Q: We’re a small team. What are our first three steps?
A: 1) Inventory where you use RSA/ECC. 2) Talk to your vendors about PQC roadmaps and hybrid options. 3) Switch to AES-256 and SHA-256+ where not already in place. Then plan a pilot.

Final takeaway: Quantum risk is real, but manageable if you start now. Inventory your crypto, test hybrid handshakes, and align to NIST’s PQC standards as they finalize. Want more practical guidance as the standards land? Subscribe for updates—I’ll share templates, checklists, and field lessons that make the migration faster and safer.

Discover more at InnoVirtuoso.com

I would love some feedback on my writing so if you have any, please don’t hesitate to leave a comment around here or in any platforms that is convenient for you.

For more on tech and other topics, explore InnoVirtuoso.com anytime. Subscribe to my newsletter and join our growing community—we’ll create something magical together. I promise, it’ll never be boring! 

Stay updated with the latest news—subscribe to our newsletter today!

Thank you all—wishing you an amazing day ahead!

Read more related Articles at InnoVirtuoso

InnoVirtuoso

Hello there! I'm passionate content writer navigating the digital landscape. With a deep love for words and an insatiable curiosity about technology.

With 10 years of experience in IT field, I write mostly about emerging tech, sharing news, informational articles and covering other topics I find interesting.

Let's craft the future of content together – one word at a time!

Browse InnoVirtuoso for more!